Sunday, April 5, 2009

Finland: Siblelius' "Flickan kom ifrån sin älsklings möte," "Luonnotar" and Saarriaho excerpt

Jean Sibelius 1865- 1957

Some things to note:
A majority of his songs are in Swedish. Sibelius was brought up in a Swedish-speaking family, but he entered a Finnish-speaking school and was bilingual, Swedish however was his mother tongue.

A couple of interesting facts concerning the language issue in 19th century Finland:

From about the year 1200 until 1809 Finland was a part of Sweden, which explains the important position of the Swedish language in the 19th century. The Swedish language remained in this position even when Finland became a Grand Duchy of Russia in 1809 and after Finland gained its independence in 1917. Today Swedish is the second official language of Finland. During the 19th century Swedish was the language of the educated classes, while Finnish was regarded as a language of the peasants. It was not until the second half of the 19th century that Finnish was recognised as the official language of Finland and the Finnish-language secondary school system was founded.

The main source of Sibelius' inspiration comes from Swedish lyric and nature poetry, whether by Finnish poets writing in Swedish such as Runeberg, Tavastjerna or mainland Swedes like Fröding and Rydberg. One quarter of his song output are by Runeberg, who was much admired by Brahms.

Both Sibelius and Swedish composer Stenhammar set the famous poem by the Finnish poet, Runeberg- "Flickan kom ifrån sin älsklings möte," which was written in Swedish. Stenhammar's is the earlier setting by seven years. Is anyone confused?
This is Sibelius' setting.




Flickan kom [från]1 sin älsklings möte,
kom med röda händer. Modern sade:
"Varav rodna dina händer, flicka?"
Flickan sade: "Jag har plockat rosor
och på törnen stungit mina händer."

Åter kom hon från sin älsklings möte,
kom med röda läppar. Modern sade:
"Varav rodna dina läppar, flicka?"
Flickan sade: "Jag har ätit hallon
och med saften målat mina läppar."

Åter kom hon från sin älsklings möte,
kom med bleka kinder. Modern sade:
"Varav blekna dina kinder, flicka?"
Flickan sade: "Red en grav, o moder!
Göm mig där och ställ ett kors däröver,
och på korset rista, som jag säger:
En gång kom hon hem med röda händer,
ty de rodnat mellan älskarns händer.
En gång kom hon hem med röda läppar,
ty de rodnat under älskarns läppar.
Senast kom hon hem med bleka kinder,
ty de bleknat genom älskarns otro."
*******************************************
The girl came from meeting her lover,
came with her hands all red. Said her mother:
"What has made your hands so red, girl?"
Said the girl: "I was picking roses
and pricked my hands on the thorns."

Again she came from meeting her lover,
came with her lips all red. Said her mother:
"What has made your lips so red, girl?"
Said the girl: "I was eating raspberries
and stained my lips with the juice."

Again she came from meeting her lover,
came with her cheeks all pale. Said her mother:
"What has made your cheeks so pale, girl?"
Said the girl: "Oh mother, dig a grave for me,
Hide me there and set a cross above,
And on the cross write as I tell you:
Once she came home with her hands all red,
... they had turned red between her lover's hands.
Once she came home with her lips all red,
... they had turned red beneath her lover's lips.
The last time she came home with her cheeks all pale,
... they had turned pale at her lover's faithlessness."

I found this particular performance interesting because it introduced me to the singing of tenor, Rickard Söderberg, whom I hadn't known and also because I've heard this piece only done by women.




LUONNOTAR 
by SIBELIUS

When I first heard Luonnotar, I was completely overwhelmed by the myth and the primeval atmosphere created in this extraordinary piece.  If you're not familiar with this piece, I think you're in for a marvelous treat. Finnish soprano, Karita Mattila is singing here.

Luonnotar (Daughter of Nature)

Language: Finnish and English translation beneath

“Olipa impi ilman tyttö,
“Air’s daughter was a virgin,
kave Luonootar korea,
Fairest daughter of creation.
ouostoi elämaätään.
Long did she abide a virgin,
Aina yksin ollessansa
Dwelling ever more so lonely
avaroilla autioilla
In those far-extending deserts.
Laskeusi lainehille
After this the maid descending
aalto impeä ajeli,
Sank upon the tossing billows
vuotta seitsemänsataa.
Seven long centuries together
Vieri impo ve’en emona
Then she swam, the Water-Mother
uipi luotehet,
Southward swam and swam to North-West,
etelät uipi kaikki ilman rannat.
Swam around in all directions.
Tuli suuri tuulen puuska,
Then a sudden mighty tempest
meren kuohuille kohotti.
Drove the billows of the waters.
Voi poloinen päiviäni,
Oh how wretched is my fortune
parempi olisi ollut
Better were it I had tarried
ilman impenä elää
Virgin in the airy regions
Oi, Ukko, Ylijumala
Ukko, thou of Gods the highest
käy tänne kutsuttaissa
Hasten here for thou art needed.
Tuli sotka, suora lintu
Then a beauteous teal came flying
lenti kaikki ilman rannat,
Flew round in all directions,
lenti luotehet, etelät,
Southward flew and flew to North-West,
ei löyä pesän sioa.
Searching for a spot to rest in.
Ei! Ei! Ei!
No! No! No!
Teenko tuulehen tupani
Should I make the wind my dwelling,
aalloillen asuinsiani.
Should I rest it on the billows,
Tuuli kaatavi, tuuli kaatavi
Then the winds will overturn it,
aalto viepi asuinsiani.
Or the waves will sweep it from me.
Niin silloin ve’en emonem
Then the Mother of the Waters
nosti polvea lainehasta
From the waves her knee uplifted;
siihen sorsa laativi
Gentle there the teal alighting
pesänsä alkoi hautoa.
So she might her nest establish
Impi tuntevi tulistuvaksi
Then the maiden felt a burning
järskytti jäsenehensä
And her limbs convulsive shaking
pesä vierähti vetehen.
Rolled the eggs into the water,
Katkieli kauppaleiksi
And to splinters they were broken,
muuttuivat munat kaunoisiksi.
And to fragments they were shattered
Munasen yläinen puoli
From the cracked egg’s upper fragment
yläuseksi taivahaksi,
Rose the lofty arch of heaven,
yläpuoli valkeaista,
From the white the upper fragment
kuuksi kumottamahan
Rose the moon that shines so brightly;
mi kirjavaista tähiksi taivaalle,
All that in the egg was mottled
ne tähiksi taivaalle.”
Now became the stars in heaven.”



One final excerpt from a piece by Kaija Saariaho. She is a gifted contemporary, Finnish composer. This is a short introduction to her compositional style. There are other examples of her work at YouTube. 

This piece was written for Edna Michell's Compassion project. Saariaho, speaking of her work: "In the composition I follow the idea of a dialogue, suggested by the text I have chosen. The intimate nature and fragile sound world of the duo mirror the fragility of our uncertain existence." Go here for more about Saariaho.

36 comments:

  1. The poetry to "Flickan kom ifrån sin älsklings möte" is so incredibly powerful and original. Although there is tons of great poetry, the Scandinavian poetry seems to have an entirely different flavor than that of say, German lied. There is a simplicity, a tenderness and a special truth that makes the poetry unlike any other. Fabulous to read!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Epic. I like the two different moods in "Luonnotar:" the drama of the instrumental sections and the more deliberate intensity of the narrative. The narrative sections capture the natural lilt of the poetry, especially with the descending lines revealing a stressed-unstressed emphasis written into the music itself. The poetry was set extremely well.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love "Luonnotar". I'm not very familiar with this piece, but I agree that it touches on the primeval. It is a stunning piece. It's great to hear "Flickan kom..." being sung by a man. I've never heard it sung by a man before. It works great with either a man or woman narrating the piece. I also think Saarriaho touches on the primeval and archetypal in her music. It seems to cut through straight to the bones. I heard an interesting interview with her when she talked about how difficult is was to grow up a woman wanting to study composition in Finland. Her parents thought she was nuts, and she went to Paris to pursue her studies. The Scandinavian countries are very equal on the surface, but when you scratch a bit deeper all sorts of things come up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I too really loved "Luonnotar." In my experience, the composers who best capture the spirit of these ethereal poetic subjects are the composers that are steeped in the natural wonders of their countries. Sibelius excellently captures the natural effects that originally spawned the supernatural tales and stories. Most of those stories were created to explain the wonders that no one had any words to describe. Obviously music is an apt vehicle for things that do not fit into words!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow, can't wait until I can sing "Luonnotar," which will probably be a good 20 years or so! The orchestra really illustrates every nuance of the story. I love that there are moments when the vocal line is simple and declamatory, almost like a folk tune or rune songs, and then the voice wanders back into more ambiguous keys and much more virtuosity.

    ReplyDelete
  6. For as stark as the Saariaho piece is, it speaks volumes! The first image that popped into my head as the song was playing was the third picture that was posted with the Scandinavia photos. They both share a very sparse, silent beauty. I love when a piece of music can be very minimal, but at the same time, be so expressive and emotional.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Sibelius's setting of "Flickan" is quite different than Stenhammar's (which I've played through). Stenhammar's contains a recurring folk-like melody (perhaps it is an actual folksong... it sounded quite familiar) while Sibelius's setting has that recurring "grand" gesture. I wasn't able to find a recording of Stenhammar's setting on youtube, but I did find a lovely recording of Birgit Nilsson singing the Sibelius with orchestra:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oAtdzX3srs

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like the combination of flute and voice in the Saariaho piece. I like the effect of their combination because at times you do not know which instrument you are hearing. I also liked the video media used in this production. It seemed to add to the affect of the performance. A similar song to this but not in classical genre is an Imogen Heap song titled "Hide and Seek". It is from her album Speak for Yourself. Listen to Hide and Seek here

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow! Luonnotar is an incredible piece--thanks for posting that. Derek, you are absolutely right: music expresses that which cannot be expressed in words. (It always baffles me that some try so hard to describe music in words...)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wow. "Luonnatar" is tremendous. It is so completely unique yet still touches on universal emotions and experiences. What an unbelievably gorgeous composition. The video added a beautiful new dimension to the piece, enhancing the listening experience. I was especially moved by the connection to nature and earthly phenomena found in this piece.

    ReplyDelete
  11. John expressed my clearest impression of Luonnotar: Epic. With such an incredibly rich color palate in the orchestra, and I cannot imagine attempting this piece with voice and piano. Is it done? I agree with Professor Vargas, Karita Mattila handles the challenging range and contrasts very well. This strikes me as a piece of music with so many rich layers that one would be hard pressed to find themselves lacking in interpretive choices to be made, re-examined, and made anew. I guess that happens when one is singing/playing the universe into existence.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Flickan--This piece was actually the first Scandinavian piece I learned and the one that inspired me to study this repertoire further. I find it interesting to contrast Sibelius' setting with Stenhammar's. Both composers capture the folk character and the drama of the poetry remarkably well despite their very different approaches. Hearing this piece in a male voice changes its character entirely--I appreciate how his rich timbre complimented the lush, Romantic texture of the piano.

    Luonnotar--The superlative adjective for this piece is epic. Like the Kalevala it is immense, ancient, and purely Finnish. I personally find this piece to be entrancing and consider it to be among Sibelius' best works. While grounded in tonality, the melody employs modal chromaticism to suggest the primal and ethereal. Singing this piece with orchestra would be a major highlight of my singing life.

    Saariaho excerpt--I found this piece very interesting. I tend to have to appreciate this sort of music from an academic standpoint, but this piece struck me differently. The purity of the singer's voice so perfectly matched the flute and gave the impression of iciness or coolness. The piece was beautiful and atmospheric. I felt that the projections also added to the experience of the piece.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hearing Flickan sung by a man was an interesting treat. I feel that his performance of the first two verses were superb, especially personifying the different characters, but then the climax seemed to lack something that I think only a soprano can give for this piece.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Changing Light - What a fascinating piece. I really enjoyed the vocalist's sound and all the different sounds she captured. Not to mention her great musicality to dig into those dissonances and nail those giant leaps!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Flickan: I was pleasantly surprised by Söderberg’s interpretation and thought his narrative approach made sense. There were moments of tenderness, but I feel like this piece is best portrayed in the soprano voice. Though I liked that he took a risk.

    Changing Light- Saariaho’s voice is so free and pure and without restraint. It seems as though she’s pulling the pitches out of the air and with such control! Just as Beverly said, I also heard felt that her timbre resembled the flute.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Personally, I liked this performance of "Flickan". He has a lovely voice, and it was an interesting contrast.

    There's a new posting of Karita Mattila singing "Luonnotar", just with some added initial sound effects, here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3a1Xzodkwo After reading all the previous comments I had to find it, and my goodness, it is stunning. The narrative is absolutely captivating, even without understanding a word of Finnish.

    The Saariaho is also stunning, but in a different sense. In a way, the interplay between flute and voice reminds me of the medieval music I've been singing lately, but with a different sound palate. It seems like a cry in the wilderness, set off spinning in the universe.

    ReplyDelete

  17. “The Tryst” is a different song when sung by a man. While some of his gestures are a bit excessive and distracting, I quite like this rendition because I feel that his arc through the song was very natural: he starts very pedantically and naturally but by the end he is singing with so much emphasis, volume, and intensity that the listener almost wonders “How did we GET here?”…in a good way. I felt that a male singer can deliver the amount of volume and weight needed towards the end in a way I haven’t heard from the female singers who sing this piece. Although, I do wish the collaborative pianist played that cascading motive with a little more intention: like Ednaldo does.

    “Changing Light” is probably one of the most haunting songs I’ve heard. The flute and the voice together create such an eerie affect. Everything sounds like an echo…perhaps that was the intention; to mimic the acoustics of sounds echoing off massive vast peaks of a fjord. I love this piece, it’s a little creepy and unsettling yet unlike anything I’ve ever heard. So delicate in some places, screamingly intense at others. COOL!

    ReplyDelete
  18. It was such a pleasure to perform "Flickan...". This piece is so intense, it seems to me that it is able to break even the most harsh "heart of stone". And every time I hear it I'm always surprised that, at least from what we get from the translations, that the poetry means so much with very simple words and straightforward sentences... except for the last strophe where all the intensity of both poetry/music explodes!

    Thank you so much for posting Luonnotar and the Saariaho pieces! Although they are so different, they share this primeval and "ethereal-mystic" qualities... It seems to me that the way the composers play with extreme registers symbolizes this extreme leap between nature forces (air/water, light/darkness, etc). Impressive pieces!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I've always thought of Sibelius's music as broad and heroic; I usually find myself thinking of romantic Viking stories when I listen to his symphonies. "Flickan kom ifran" has some truly beautiful intimate moments, which surprised me. Sibelius manages to keep his dramatic nature even in those intimate moments which makes the ending of the song truly heart breaking.

    Luonnotar sounds like a song Sibelius would write- the orchestra is expansive with strong image painting in the texture of the orchestration. The large scope of the piece and the almost Wagnerian narrative line create an overall experience. I'm not sure I could repeat the vocal melody line after one listening session, but I can remember large parts of the story.

    ReplyDelete
  20. For "Flickan…", somehow it sounds like Tchaikovsky to me, if I don't listen to the language of the text. The end of the song is very stunning to me. The harmonic twist from D-flat major to C-sharp minor makes the ending very dramatic and also powerful.

    I definitely love "Luonnotar"! The orchestration really captures the nature's image and power through different kinds of timbre. This song really grasps my attention as it is so complex and intense throughout.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Both pieces surprised me in that neither of them make me think "art song" while listening to them.

    The tenor's performance of Flickan kom if ran sin älsklings möte give me the impression that the song was an opera aria, perhaps by Tchaikovsky. It reminds me of our studies in the German lied as the voice is challenged to fill larger spaces and compete against the accompaniment of a full orchestra versus a piano. The accompaniment in the piano sounds like a reduced orchestra part, for it has a certain kind of grandeur to it.

    Luonnotar was really lovely. It is more clearly Sibelius to me because of the orchestration--the string writing is so reminiscent of his symphonies. The atmosphere is beautiful and the vocal writing was quite haunting. I wouldn't have guessed that these two pieces were written by the same composer.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Both "Flickean Kom" and "Luonnotar" have a level of drama and extravagance that elevate them above what is commonly observed in the art song genre.

    In the case of "Flicken Kom," I was not familiar with the piece prior to this introduction, and as it is referred to as being done more often by women, I decided to look up other recordings as well. In regards to the poetry, it presents a really sticking imagery, and it is definitely highlighted in the music. In the recording of the tenor (Jussi BjØling) I was less impressed with the expressive quality when compared to Barbara Bonney's rendition. BjØling's performance felt more stagnant (aside from the third stanza) than Bonney's performance. A large part of this I feel has to do with the restrictions of expression (in regards to dynamic, tempo, rubato, etc.) that come with performing with an orchestra, as BjØling was, while Bonney had the expressive freedom that comes with collaborating with a single pianist.

    In "Luonnotar," even more so than "Flickan kom," I was overwhelmed by the pure dramatic expression within the vocal line and the orchestration as a whole. The piece, with the voice taken away, could function as a movement to a symphony. The atmosphere and imagery created by the orchestra allows the vocal line to fly over the sea of sound that is created, creating a stunning and virtuosic line at times. This is a stunning introduction to Scandinavian art song for myself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dylan, here's the link to the other performance I speak about in this post, by Rickard Söderberg. I had to remove it from the post because it seemed to no longer work. But I found it again. Here's the link:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=593hd-sc3N4

      Delete
  26. Changing Light is very compelling. The choices of vibrato and especially non vibrato reminded me of the still and frozen water in Scandinavia. The harmonies and emptiness in the sound of the flute created a feeling of vast landscape, and the voice emulated this landscape with a reaching/stretching quality in the phrasing. The extreme registers also harken to the relationship of earth and the northern lights.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I had heard Sibelius symphonies but honestly didn't pay that much attention, and certainly wasn't familiar with his vocal music. In listening to Flickan I thought it sounded like opera- first I thought a little like Puccini and then Verdi and then Wagner and then Strauss! Obviously I am still trying to place it. Looking forward to hearing more like this to get a better idea of how the Scandinavian orchestral songs fit in with the other late Romantic repertoire we've studied.

    ReplyDelete
  28. In høte, the relative importance of the bass and soprano lines remind me of Brahms, however, the way the piano melodies echo those of the voice, continuing and completing their thoughts evokes the piano writing of Schumann. The harmonic language distinguishes it from those early romantic german composers, as the form is more through composed and the writing more chromatic. Overall, the writing is wistful in tone and depicts both the timidity and intimacy of the lovers’ interactions.

    I was really struck by Treekem’s recording of Bjornstad. The mixture of drone and simple chordal piano creates a very different texture than we’ve heard in previous settings of this text. It brings to mind our conversation about how the geography of a place might influence the compositional style. The open 5ths and raw vocal texture and tone mirror the open landscapes and towering fjords of Scandinavia.

    I absolutely love the music of Sibelius, and I think you can hear the composer’s gift for beautifully sweeping orchestral writing in this song. The waves and wind are depicted beautifully in the orchestration and the haunting vocalize over such a spare texture is really unique and striking. I admire how this piece changes texture in really dramatic yet effective and almost imperceptible ways. The singer obviously has great control over her instrument and responds beautifully to these changes.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The story and mythos of “Luonnotar” is reminiscent of Tolkien to me. That is to say, I was immediately pulled into the legend and will likely remain captivated every time I hear the piece, just as I would be while viewing or reading Tolkien’s works like Lord of the Rings or The Silmarillion. This is a common comparison, as Tolkien and Sibelius shared interest in mythological Finnish texts such as the “Kalevala,” from which the stories of Luonnotar and Kullervo come. While Sibelius set these stories to music, Tolkien did groundbreaking work in the realm of translation of Finnish into English, particularly in his prose-setting of Kullervo. While it is unlikely that Tolkien ever heard Sibelius’s “Kullervo” and there is no evidence that the two ever met, it is probable that they were at least aware of each other’s work. What a collaboration it could have been!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Luonnotar is quite the adventure! There's so much symbolism and allegory to be plumbed here, both in the poetry and in the music.
    The big thing that I notice is the overwhelming presence of water and waves. The high points both in the poetry and the music come in waves. It's a creation story, which has to do with water and wind in nearly every culture. Wind is partly the cause of waves. It's birthing story, and I find the connection of women and giving birth to waves and water an interesting subject generally. When giving birth, contractions literally come in waves and there is an event in the process called the "water break," when the sac containing the baby breaks and amniotic fluid (or "water") comes out, often along with the baby.

    Sibelius has done such a great job creating the bigger picture of big waves with the larger chunks of music and painting the little details of each line as well. For example: the bird flitting here and there looking for a place to rest and build a nest is audibly depicted by the flutes and melodic figures in the narrating voice. There are just so many layers to his music, just like there are so many layers in the poem.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I thought this was a nice setting of Flickan kom ifrån sin älsklings möte, but personally I preferred the Stenhammar version more.
    The energy in the beginning of Luonnotar is absolutely electric. It feels as if it could be in the background of an adventure movie as the camera sweeps over a forest. Nature themes/elements are in the poetry and reflected in the music. It feels very atmospheric. I really, really liked it! Very different and stunning.
    Saariaho's piece was so atmospheric. I like that the flute and soprano played off of each other. As they are both treble instruments, it was created a very striking sound that would've been much different had the composer used bass instrument and soprano. Overall, it was very cool!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Through listening to these recordings, I feel that Sibelius is good at using wind instruments to create a gloomy and sultry atmosphere, reminiscent of the natural scenery of Finland, but also good at presenting majestic and magnificent music effects. This kind of character is shown in "Flickan kom ifrån sin älsklings möte" obviously.

    My primary feeling when I was listening to the Luonnotar is - this music sounds so mysterious (or maybe unearthly?). The melody of singers sounds very unique, and the color of the whole orchestra cannot be said to be bright, and it seems that the desolation of Sibelius is the keynote.

    ReplyDelete
  33. It is difficult to deny the mystical (and perhaps mythical) atmosphere in Luonnotar. From the initial stings giving a sense of urgency and the lyrical, sweeping line of the voice giving us this fantastic narrative, I was struck with the image of a bard telling the story of the creation of the stars. There were parts in the vocal line that felt very primeval, and I think Saariaho seemed to expand on that in her piece. The imitation of a shout, yell, or scream is such an intense effect in comparison with "regular" (for lack of a better word) classical singing. I don't know if I can put into words what I felt, but it was unlike anything I've felt listening to almost any other classical piece.

    ReplyDelete
  34. I have very few words to describe that setting of Flickan. I have always been an admirer of Sibelius' symphonic works and it seems to translate over to his vocal works seamlessly. The strophic-like nature of the text with the build up to the final stanza when she tells the truth is represented subliminally in Sibelius' writing and the final high note is absolute perfection. Luonnotar on the other hand is just as beautiful, but has a much longer narrative with much more variance is dynamic, vocal, and orchestral texture. I need to find some Sibelius pieces for my repertoire!

    ReplyDelete